AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/049
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University hospital center of Limoges, Limoges, France.
2Department of Medical Oncology, University hospital center of Limoges, Limoges, France
*Corresponding Author: Aurelia Alati, Radiothérapie, CHU de Limoges, 2 avenue Martin Luther King 87042 Limoges Cedex, France.
Citation: Alati Aurélia, Leobon Sophie, Clavère Pierre, (2021) Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia after Breast Cancer Radiotherapy and letrozole: A Case Report and Literature Review. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study. 4(3); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/049
Copyright: © 2021 Aurelia Alati, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 May 2021 | Accepted: 11 May 2021 | Published: 17 May 2021
Keywords: bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia; organizing pneumonia; radiation therapy; breast cancer; letrozole
Objectives:
Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia occurs with prevalence rate 1–3% after breast conservative treatment in series. In response to radiation of a lung or surrounding tissues, an inflammatory reaction can affect both lungs and is located within the radiation field. Characteristic imaging features include multiple alveolar opacities and diffuse ground-glass shadows. Letrozole may induce iatrogenic organizing pneumonia.
Materials and methods:
we report the case of a 76-year-old female who underwent conservative treatment for an invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast. Hypofractionated radiotherapy was delivered with a total dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 sessions of 2.65 Gy using a three-dimensional technique. After the radiotherapy ended letrozole was indicated.
Results:
Several weeks after the radiotherapy ended and letrozole was introduced, she described a flu-like syndrome. Samples were negative, and there was no improvement after four courses of antibiotics. Imaging suggested bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Her symptomatology lessened after the letrozole was discontinued, and 11 months after radiotherapy finished, her imaging results were clear.
Conclusion:
Physicians must consider bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Cases may increase with hypofractionated radiation treatment and new drugs. Letrozole may potentiate the risk. Dosimetry may be adapted to the lung and subpleural areas for patients with risk factors and taking adjuvant or concurrent drugs with potential pneumotoxicity.
Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia occurs with prevalence rate 1–3
We report the case of a 76-year-old female. She had three pregnancies, menopause at age 49 years, and was on no treatment. She self-palpated a nodule of the left breast leading to the diagnosis of a tumor in the upper-inner quadrant. Tumorectomy found a grade 1, invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (axis 0.9 cm) that tested positive for hormone receptor and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. The tumor resection margins and sentinel lymph-node biopsy were negative. She received adjuvant whole-breast irradiation with a three-dimensional conformal technique. Hypofractionated radiotherapy was delivered with a total dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 sessions of 2.65 Gy. Treatment was well tolerated. Letrozole was introduced when radiotherapy ceased [10,16]. At the third-month evaluation, she described side effects of letrozole, with hot flashes, and weight gain of 2.5 kg associated with increasing dyspnea grade 2 (Medical Research Council [17], dry cough, and intermittent low-grade fever. No other drug had been introduced. Physical examination did not find signs of heart failure or venous thromboembolic disease. Chest X-ray showed a pneumopathy in the left lobar base. Chest tomography revealed a post-radiation appearance of consolidation in the left lung (Figure. 1A). All serologies were negative. Symptoms progressively worsened despite four courses of antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin and clavulanate, cephalosporin, macrolide [18,19]. Bronchial endoscopy found a normal bronchial tree and the absence of secretions. Bronchioalveolar lavage was negative for pathogens but identified lymphocytic alveolitis with no eosinophilic disorder. Computed tomography showed bilateral pneumopathy with alveolar consolidation, and a diffuse ground-glass appearance, in keeping with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (Figure. 1B). She received low-dose corticotherapy (<1>
With the chronology and the interstitial lung disorder, we considered drug-induced pneumonia due to letrozole. One month after letrozole was discontinued, and nine months after radiotherapy ceased, computed tomography revealed a partial regression of the opacities, with clinical improvement. Eleven and 5 months after radiotherapy and letrozole ended, respectively, computed tomography revealed disappearance of the abnormalities (Figure. 1C), and the patient had fully recovered without permanent sequelae. Regarding dosimetry, lung and subpleural areas received radiation (Dmax: 43 Gy) with the tangential field (Figure 2A). The mean dose received by the ipsilateral lung was 8.7 Gy, with the volume receiving 20 Gy equal to 17% (Figure. 2B).
The patient was diagnosed and followed-up at the Dupuytren University Hospital Centre in Limoges, France. A postmenopausal female who underwent conservative treatment for an invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast that tested positive for hormone receptor. Hypofractionated radiotherapy was delivered with a total dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 sessions of 2.65 Gy by a Clinac 2300 linear accelerator, using a three-dimensional technique. The prescribed dose of 42.5 Gy was delivered to the planned target volume (PTV) (whole mammary gland with a margin of 5mm) and it received 95% of the prescribed dose (Figure. 2B). After the radiotherapy ended letrozole was started 2.5 mg per day for 5 years.
Conventional whole-breast or chest-wall radiotherapy is the standard treatment after breast cancer surgery. Adjuvant radiation improves local control, disease-free survival, and mortality rates [20]. However, radiotherapy can induce early and late pulmonary toxicity. Organizing pneumonia is rarely described, but cases of bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia after radiation therapy have increased in literature. Radiation therapy or letrozole are the least-described triggering factors. The tangential radiation field generally spares the parenchyma but causes inflammation of the subpleural region, rich in lymphoid tissue, inducing lymphocyte recruitment and alveolitis. In addition, part of patients irradiated for breast neoplasia have discrete pleural effusion [21]. Radiation of one lung can create inflammation in both lungs [22,23], highlighted by bilateral lymphocytic alveolitis and biopsy [24,25]. Cottin et al. reported five cases of eosinophilic pneumonia in atopic patients caused by whole-breast radiotherapy [26]. Pneumopathy occurs within 3 weeks to 12 months after radiation and can disappear within a year. Symptoms appear within several weeks to more than a year after radiotherapy ceases. As our case, shortness of breath or dry cough during radiotherapy may be an early sign of a pulmonary reaction and further toxicity. Patients experience a flu-like syndrome: dry cough, increasing dyspnea, persistent low-grade fever, and sometimes chest pain [6,25,27]. There is a lack of clinical response to antibiotic therapy with no pathogen found. Pulmonary function test results can be normal. Bronchioalveolar lavage can show no abnormalities or hypercellularity [24,25,27]. Computed tomography reveals diffuse ground-glass opacities with air–space consolidation. Patchy opacities occur more frequently in the periphery and lower-lung zones. Varying abnormalities are characteristic, in the radiation-exposed lung and extending into the contralateral lung, outside the radiation fields, which distinguish it from radiation pneumonitis [1,25]. With this suggestive radiological and clinical presentation, biopsy is not mandatory [24]. A literature review identified some recurrent risk factors: age > 50 years [13], chemotherapy and concurrent endocrine therapy. A preclinical study has shown Letrozole can be a radiosensitiver, but the association with normofractionated radiotherapy is considered as safe [28,29] and incidence of lung fibrosis is similar between concurrent and sequential introduction of aromatase inhibitors [29]. One case suggested that trastuzumab had induced organizing pneumonia after breast irradiation [30]. It may occur with genetic mutations and an individual response of hypersensitivity to radiation [31]. Oie et al. suggested a link between organizing pneumonia and radiation pneumonitis [2]. They concluded that opacities spread from the site of radiation pneumonitis to the hilum and often to the contralateral lung. In a meta-analysis, radiation pneumonitis risk factors were hypofractionation (dose > 2.5 Gy), the volume of irradiated lung, and several concomitant drugs. By contrast, organizing pneumonia is not associated with irradiated lung volume [13], one study showed a correlation with central lung distance > 1.8 cm [4]. Cases have been reported after hypofractionation [30,32], partial breast [13] and chest-wall irradiation [33,34]; with three-dimensional radiotherapy. In our case no biopsy was realised and corticotherapy was too brief. We cannot exclude letrozole a cause. To our knowledge this is the first case in which there is the temporal correlation between Letrozole initiation and symptoms emergence, and both scanner normalization and symptomatic improvement after discontinuation of letrozole without immunosuppressive treatment. Cough, dyspnea, and interstitial pneumonitis are rare sides effects of Letrozole [35–37]. Several cases of pneumopathy with anti-aromatase have been reported [35,38,39] and the time to start adjuvant hormonotherapy in patients who will receive post-operative radiotherapy remain controversial moreover with hypofractionnated scheme in which dose per fraction can rise 2.67 to 6 Gy [40,41]. A study shown mild to moderate toxicity but not designed for assessment of lung toxicity [42]. Treatment should depend on the severity of clinical conditions, and considering the adverse effects of prolonged corticosteroids and risk of relapse [43]. A few deaths have been reported.
Physicians must consider bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Cases may increase with hypofractionated radiation treatment and new drugs. Letrozole could potentiate the risk. Dosimetry may be adapted to the lung and subpleural areas of patients with risk factors and taking adjuvant or concurrent drugs with potential pneumotoxcity.
The patient kindly provided her informed consent at the time of hospital admission to the publication of personal data.
FUNDING DECLARATION
This research was not funded by any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Textcheck for their assistance with editing the language of this manuscript. The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/41yqjy
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
